The earlier note on this site about the funayūrei was built from a vocabulary of fishing villages: a dozen local names along the coast, and one shared instruction — knock the bottom out of the ladle before you lend it.
That is the folklorist’s layer, collected in the twentieth century from people who still used the words.
Underneath it is a different one. A lecture course of the 1890s gathers what the Edo books said about the same thing, and the Edo books are not interested in vocabulary. They are interested in what happened on a particular night, and in what worked.
Between them they supply five separate ways of getting home, and only one is the one everybody knows.
First, the sequence, because no modern account gives it.
The thing begins, one book says, as a wisp about the size of a handful of cotton, drifting on the waves as though blown there. As the white thing slowly grows, a face forms on it — eyes and a nose come — and there is a faint voice, like someone calling to a friend.
Then dozens appear at once, surfacing near and far. They come up with the manner of things about to board. They get their hands on the gunwale and hold the boat back, and the crew, rowing, cannot get away.
And then they speak, and the book is careful about this: the words they say are perfectly distinct.
What they say is inada kase — lend us an inada.
The book stops to explain the word, which is the detail that gives the whole thing away. Inada is not a literary term. It is sailors’ slang for the big dipper carried aboard. The creatures are asking for a working tool by the name the crew use for it among themselves.
A man who knows his business takes the dipper, knocks the bottom out, and throws it to them. They take it and bail with all their strength, trying to fill the boat. Give them one with a bottom in it and they will scoop the sea aboard and sink you.
That is the same rule, with the same stated reason, that the fishing villages were still giving three centuries later — two entirely separate bodies of evidence agreeing on both the action and the mechanism.
The same passage crosses to China for a comparison, to a stretch of water known as the Weeping Demons’ Shoal.
There, when a boat comes on, over a hundred of them swarm up: short, stunted figures, headless, one hand and one foot apiece, fighting to overturn the vessel.
And the remedy there is not a tool. Throw them the crew’s food and they vanish.
Set the two side by side and the difference is the whole argument. One coast disables the thing’s equipment; the other feeds it. The first treats it as an adversary with a method; the second treats it as a hungry crowd.

Kawanabe Kyōsai’s ship ghosts. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
The best case in the section comes from a book of strange travels, and it reads like a deck log.
A vessel of about five hundred koku was going from Chikugo to Nagasaki. There was no wind, so she lay at anchor offshore waiting for one, from the Hour of the Sheep until the Hour of the Dog. It was the tenth of the seventh month; the moon had gone west and the light was very poor; it clouded over, and a sudden squall came down, and the offing went darker still.
Out of that came a ship rowing hard, driving straight at them. Voices, distant at first, then close.
What the crew did is the first countermeasure. From the master down to the last hand, they shut their mouths.
The voices came right up, and went round and round the ship, and grew wilder — and the master forbade anyone to answer.
Then, after a while, one of the hands did the second thing. He set fire to a piece of matting and threw it into the sea, aiming at the voices. The voices stopped at once.
A following wind got up, they made sail, and were into Nagasaki near dawn. Asking about it afterwards, they were told it had been a funayūrei.
The writer’s own comment is worth having. The souls of those lost at sea gather, he supposes, using warmth against the cold — perhaps because this life is still dear to them. And that driving them off with fire should work, he says, is in any case a strange thing.
The last one is not a technique at all.
A book of window-side talk gives an account of a celebrated master mariner, a man who had run every dangerous water in the country. His standing rule was that one should think hard before sailing on the last day of the month.
One time he was at sea alone when the wind turned, the seas came against him, black cloud came over, and the ship was flung up as though into the air. Anybody’s spirit would have failed. He simply crouched down and did not move.
And facing him there came up a great monk, a jō tall, with eyes like mirrors daubed with vermilion, who said to him: is my form not terrifying?
He answered: apart from making a living in this world, there is nothing especially terrifying.
The apparition vanished on the spot, the wind and sea went down, and he got home with his life.
I would put that line up against anything in this subject. It is not a charm and not a prayer. It is a professional seaman being asked whether he is frightened, and answering that the frightening thing is the job.
One more item, because it is the only case here where the supernatural and the navigational aid are in direct competition.
On stormy nights, people ashore would climb the high ground on the seaward bearing of the sea lane and light beacon fires to guide the boats in. And the demons would raise fires out at sea as well, to confuse them.
So crews would fall to arguing — is the southern light the one the people lit, or is the northern one demon-fire? — and lose the lane, and drift about while they disputed it, and be drawn off and drowned, and become demons in their turn.
One sailor’s rule for telling them apart: a human fire stays where it is; a demon fire will not keep still, rising to the right and hiding to the left. Demons also put up dozens of false sails and appear to run before the wind. A human sail runs with the wind; a demon sail goes against it.
And then the honest sentence: faced with the thing, even an old hand who has seen it before loses his head, and it is hard to come out of it alive.
The lecturer, having printed all of this, gives his own account, and it is a list of what a person at sea at night is in fact looking at: the light of waves and of sea creatures, large fish breaking the surface, faint mist hanging, and drifting wreckage and broken timber.
All of which, he says, brings on illusions of various kinds — the same as treading on a rope and taking fright at a snake, or seeing dry pampas grass move and calling it a ghost.
He is largely right, and it does not touch the interesting part. Every one of the five responses above was devised by someone who believed the thing was real. The bottomless ladle, the thrown food, the shut mouth, the burning mat and the flat answer are five different theories of what kind of being it was — a thief, a beggar, a caller, an enemy, and a bully — and each crew’s theory is visible in what they reached for in the dark.
The reading in “What Was Actually Out There” is KWAIDANOTE’s own.
Found an error? Write to kwaidanote@gmail.com — corrections are made on this page and dated.